Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Unit 6 Re-Write: Successes and Limits of Progressive Era Reformers


The Progressive Era movement emerged as a response to the exposed corruption in the federal government in the post-Reconstruction years. Most progressives were middle-class, white Christians who wanted to preserve the morality of the nation as it underwent dynamic changes.  From 1900 to 1920, although limited by conservative opposition, Progressive Era reformers and the federal government had considerable success in bringing about democratic and political reform on the national level; moreover, Progressive Era Reformers obtained considerable success in meeting their economic reform goals, despite being limited by a conservative Supreme Court; however not all reforms enjoyed success. Efforts for racial reform by the federal government and Progressives were limited by heavy opposition from conservatives and racist organizations and, thereby, were largely unsuccessful.
        Despite being limited by Conservative opposition, the Progressive Era reformers were largely successful in their democratic and political reforms. A 1912 speech by Theodore Roosevelt called for direct election, by the populace, of United States Senators (D). A year later, in 1913, the passage of the 17th amendment established the direct elections Roosevelt had called for, exemplifying a major success in the efforts by the Progressive Era reformers in their crusade for political change and helped curb corruption and partisan politics in the legislative branch.  Further reforms were adopted by state governments on the national level. State reforms such as the initiative, the referendum, and the recall were made possible by progressives like Robert La Follete, governor of Wisconsin, and were soon adopted by the rest of the nation. These reforms were major successes for progressives as they gave the people a way to bypass the government and ensure that government laws, practices, and officials were not corrupt. However, there were some progressives, as displayed by Herbert Croley in New Republic, that believed the reforms of the era were inadequate (F); nevertheless, there was an unprecedented amount of success for progressive reformers between 1900 and 1920. This success, however, was still marginally limited. Conservative interest groups such as large corporations and political machines sought to limit the success of Progressive Era.
The most lasting political reform of the federal government during the Progressive Era concerned suffrage. A 1918 photograph of a suffragist demonstrator illustrated that many American women were still without the right to vote. This longing for the right to vote would, in 1920, cease with the passage of the 19th amendment, giving women suffrage and meeting an immense political progressive reform goal (H).  
Progressive Era reformers had considerable success in meeting their economic reform goals, although they were limited by the Supreme Court. A Washington Post political cartoon portrayed Theodore Roosevelt as a manager of trusts and economic consolidation, hunting “bad trusts” and leaving “good trusts” alone (A). Roosevelt, one of the most dynamic reformers of the era, also established agencies like the Department of Commerce in 1903 and the Bureau of Corporations to limit to limit the monopolization and consolidation of industry. Roosevelt furthered the success of progressive reform when he broke up the Northern Securities Company in 1902 for monopolizing the railroad industry in the Midwest. Roosevelt’s efforts also represented successes in labor reform. For example, Roosevelt served as an arbitrator in a 1901 Tennessee miner’s-strike--an unprecedented move by a president. Moreover, a modification of the Clayton Antitrust Act made it impossible for the act to be used against labor unions and also sought to put an end to discriminatory prices (E). Although it was not enforced by President Woodrow Wilson (who made progressive through his program “New Freedom”), it nevertheless put the practice into written law and was still a significant success of progressives. Another success for labor reform came as a response to the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire in New York, which prompted municipal governments to regulate and improve working conditions. Progressive Era reformers also made significant success in their efforts to reform the service sector of the economy. The Neill-Reynold Report of 1906 uncovered atrocious sanitation conditions in the meatpacking industry. This report, in combination with other works such as Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel, The Jungle, prompted Roosevelt to pass the the Meat Inspection Act in 1907, another major reform success. The success of the progressives and the federal government in reforming the economy were not without limits, however.
The success of the Progressive Era reformers in meeting their economic goals was limited by the Supreme Court. This was most notable in the debate regarding child labor laws. Reformers like Jane Addams, founder of Hull House in Chicago, were outraged at the use of children in the workforce and called  for a focus on education for children rather than labor (C). However, many advocated for child labor. In Hammer v. Dagenhart in 1918 the Supreme Court ruled that the regulation of child labor was not a matter of interstate commerce; therefore, the 1916 Keating-Owen Act and Smith-Lever Acts were ruled unconstitutional and child labor could not be regulated by the federal government. As a result regulation fell to state and local governments where often times little as done to regulate or abolish child labor (G). Progressive reformers also were limited in their efforts for racial reform by racist organizations and culture.
Efforts for civil rights and racial reform  between 1900 and 1920 by progressives was sharply limited by racist culture, and, as a result, reformers met little success. In his magazine The Crisis, W.E.B DuBois noted that African Americans, who had been discriminated against since they gained citizenship, still faced large prejudice in 1919 form the country they fought and died to protect in their involvement in World War II (I). DuBois and other reformers like Ida B Wells, who led a failed campaign to make lynching a federal crime, wanted to reform the racist culture of the United States. Their effort was sharply limited by racist organizations like the Klu Klux Klan who used terrorism and intimidation tactics to keep African Americans in a subjugated position and racism present in American society.
From 1900 to 1920 Progressive Era reformers and the federal government had considerable success, although limited by conservative opposition, in bringing about democratic reform; moreover, Progressive Era Reformers obtained considerable success in meeting their economic reform goals, but were limited by a conservative Supreme Court; however, efforts for racial reform by the federal government and Progressives obtained little success and were limited by heavy opposition from conservatives and racist organizations.

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

SMART Goal for May 13th

SMART Goal for May 13th 2014: Take last AP practice multiple choice in Kaplan review book. Received grade of 78% use feedback from test to target last-minute studying to modern era (I missed the most from this time period)

Monday, May 12, 2014

SMART Goal for May 12th 2014

SMART Goal for May 12th 2014: Take practice AP exam in back of Kaplan review book. Finished with twenty five minutes left and received score of 61/80 or 76%. Feedback from test showed that I am weakest in the time period 1915 to present.

Sunday, May 11, 2014

SMART Goal for April 16th through May 11th: Read chapters nine through thirty in Kaplan review book, finishing review book by the Sunday before the AP exam. Take quizzes after each chapter to measure strength of review.

Sunday, April 6, 2014

SMART Goal for 4/4/14 to 4/6/14

SMART Goal for April fourth through 16th: finish review of early American history by reading through chapter nine Kaplan AP exam review booklet.

Thursday, April 3, 2014

SMART Goal for 4/3/14: Continue review of Early American History with review of key dates in the age of exploration, colonial, and revolutionary key date flashcards on memrise.

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

SMART Goal for Spring Break

My SMART Goal for Spring Break was to study Brainscape Flashcards on the first three chapters of the text. I was able to realize my goal; however, I do need to increase my studying time and study more than one source

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Impacts of Big Business on Economics and Politics and the Response of the American People


In the post-Civil War era, big business in the United expanded dramatically and rapidly. This expansion led to a stark increase in the production of American goods, in the amount of unskilled laborers, and in the amount of wealth in the country, while simultaneously eliminating small-scale competition and sharply weakening the demand for skilled workers; furthermore, the expansion of big business  caused unprecedented large scale corruption in the political system. The American people responded to these impacts through both an increased participation in consumerism and the formation of both political and economic organizations that sought to curb the prodigious influence of big business on American society.
Big business led to a drastic expansion in the production of American goods and the amount of capital in the nation. Big business al specifically increased the production of energy. A graph showing the food, fuel, and lighting prices as well as the standard of living illustrated that prices for  food, fuel, and lighting declined significantly between 1870 and 1899 and that the standard of living also slightly  decreased. These decreases were due to big business and the ability to mass produce these utilities by companies like Pillsbury and Standard Oil and due to the utilization of technological innovations such as the use of the Bessemer Converter (used to mass produce steel) by US Steel  (A). Mass production also led to an increase in the amount of wealth in the United States. Industrial exports, especially steel, sharply increased because of the mass production of products by massive corporations like US Steel and Ford Automobiles. Through the wealth created by big business, the United States saw the first large scale charity work by industrialists.
Large corporations produced immense, concentrated amounts of wealth in American society; through their concentrated fortunes, many American industrialist were enabled to give back to the nation and society. Andrew Carnegie, in Wealth, stressed the need for the rich to give back to the poor and present them with an opportunity to better their social and economic situation. Carnegie, himself once a poor Irish immigrant, set up a trust to provide libraries for the urban poor as a means of climbing the socioeconomic ladder (E). Other industrial leaders made similar efforts as Carnegie. John D. Rockefeller, for example, set up similar trusts to bolster the situation of the poor. Large scale corporations not only impacted the poor of American society with an increased amount of charity work, but also with an increased amount of job opportunities.
Large-scale businesses also led to a myriad of job opportunities for unskilled workers and minorities. A photograph of female typists in 1902 exemplified the magnitude to which minority groups and unskilled laborers were employed under big business. Although wages were low and working conditions were poor, big business did create hundreds of thousands of previously unavailable job  opportunities for minority groups and unskilled workers (J).  along with new job opportunities came mass production and with this mass production, came the American response of a growing involvement in consumer culture.
The American people responded to mass production by purchasing more goods and strengthening the consumer culture. Theodore Dreiser, in Sister Carrie, illustrated the the effect of department stores on the public and the increasing urbanization and consumerism associated with it. These department stores--such as those of the Montgomery Ward Company--were enabled by the ability to mass produce consumer goods and appealed mostly to those who could afford them--namely, the upper and middle classes (I). So, consumerism was a response to big business’s impact on the American people that was largely limited to the wealthy or those who could afford to consume goods. However, Big Business did sharply limit competition in the market and harm the local economy.
Big business monopolized industry and harmed the local economy. As noted in by George Rice in “How I Was ruined by Rockefeller”, big business eliminated competition through methods such as vertical and horizontal integration, utilizing the theories of economies of scale, and, perhaps most significantly, through the rebate on shipping goods by railroad. Through these practices, small companies had essentially no way to avoid the monopolization of their companies by a bigger one, such as Rockefeller’s Standard Oil (H).  Large scale corporations, utilizing Taylorism, also sharply cut the demand for skilled workers. The economist and engineer David Wells in 1889 discussed this bypass of the skilled worker in the new industrial system (C).  Because Industrialist could produce the same product as a skilled worker more cheaply and efficiently, the decline of the skilled worker came about rather quickly. Big business not only monopolized the economy, but also caused unprecedented corruption in the political system.
Big business impacted American politics by establishing a firm and corrupt foothold in the government. A labor leader in 1887 illuminated the vast amount of control corporation owners had, not only in the economy, but in American society as a whole, most notably in politics (C). The  amount of control big business had in politics was incredibly large, best depicted in these of the Sherman Antitrust Act to break up labor unions by the federal government (which was controlled by industrialists). Joseph Keppler’s political cartoon in Puck described the massive corruption in the political system to the extent that he claimed that the Senate was no longer for the people, but now for the leading industrial tycoons (D).  The American people responded to the unprecedented influence of big business in society by forming political and economic organizations that sought to curb the authority of large corporations.
Perhaps the most significant response of the American people to the impacts of big business on society was the formation of political and economic organizations to combat the authority of big business. Samuel Gompers, leader of the American Federation of Labor, demanded that corporations improve conditions and wages for the worker and recognize the right of workers to unite for a common voice to combat the corporations. Other unions like the Knights of Labor and the Grangers sought to limit the authority of big business and used tactics such as striking. The most notable of which were the Haymarket Square and Pullman Strikes; however, the government did not intervene on the side of labor in either instance, once again illustrating the corruption of the political system by big business. Other organizations sought to use politics as a means to combat big business. The People’s Party stated in their platform that their goal was to limit the influence of big business in the government and return authority to those it belongs to--the people (F). Both the PEople’s party and the Grangers established considerable gains in ending corruption in the political system; The People’s Party removed many corrupt officials from office and the Grangers established laws the benefited farmers. This was a response mostly confined to the poor and the progressives of the  middle class.
In conclusion, Big business impacted the economy through monopolization, increased production, and the employment of unskilled laborers; moreover, big business caused political corruption, to which the American people responded with organizations to combat the authority of big business in society and with increased consumerism